You tour the school on a Thursday afternoon, and everything gleams. The principal speaks passionately about personalized learning. The hallways are quiet, orderly, decorated with student work. A teacher mentions college prep; another talks about "family culture." By the time you leave, you're already imagining your daughter walking through those doors in September.

This is the seduction of school choice—the intoxicating possibility that somewhere out there is the perfect fit, the place that will see your child clearly and help her flourish. For millions of American families, charter schools have become that somewhere: publicly funded, tuition-free, often animated by a distinct mission or philosophy, and freed from some of the regulations that govern traditional district schools.

But not every charter school delivers on its promises. And unlike a disappointing restaurant or a mediocre summer camp, a struggling school can leave lasting marks on a child's education—sometimes on their sense of self. According to research published in 2024 by the National Center for Charter School Accountability, more than one in four charter schools close within five years of opening, and by year twenty, the failure rate reaches fifty-five percent. Between 1999 and 2022, more than 1.1 million students were affected by charter school closures, often with less than one month's notice.

This isn't an argument against charter schools. Many are excellent—innovative, responsive, deeply committed to the students they serve. But precisely because charters vary so widely in quality, and because their autonomy can mean less oversight, parents need to become skilled evaluators. The glossy brochure and the passionate tour guide aren't enough. You need to know what questions to ask, what patterns to watch for, and when to trust the knot forming in your stomach.

• • •

The warning signs tend to cluster into four categories: academic concerns, operational instability, financial trouble, and school culture problems. None of these alone is necessarily disqualifying—schools, like families, go through rough patches. But when multiple red flags appear together, or when a school seems unwilling to discuss them honestly, it's worth paying attention.

Start with academics, because that's presumably why you're considering the school in the first place. Transparency about curriculum is fundamental. A school that can't clearly explain what it teaches and how it measures progress should give you pause. This doesn't mean you need to see a binder full of lesson plans; it means that when you ask "What will my daughter learn in fifth-grade math?" you should get a substantive answer, not vague talk about "meeting students where they are" or "preparing them for the future." Vagueness often masks either confusion or a reluctance to be held accountable.

Watch for signs that the school defines success too narrowly. Teaching to the test—drilling students relentlessly on the specific content and formats of state assessments—can produce impressive-looking scores while leaving children unprepared for the broader demands of learning. If the curriculum seems thin, if everything circles back to test prep, if teachers speak only in the language of proficiency levels and performance bands, you may be looking at a school that has confused measurement with education. Research from Stanford's Center for Research on Education Outcomes has found that charter school effects on test scores vary enormously by school and location, and that charters overall are neither more nor less effective than traditional public schools at boosting achievement. In other words, test scores alone tell you surprisingly little.

Grade inflation is harder to spot but equally concerning. If every child seems to be earning A's and B's while state test scores remain mediocre, something isn't adding up. Ask the school how its grading practices align with external measures. Ask what percentage of students who leave for high school arrive academically prepared. A school that can't or won't answer these questions may be trading rigor for the appearance of success.

• • •

Operational red flags often signal trouble beneath the surface. High teacher turnover is among the most revealing. According to research by Education Resource Strategies, schools serving high-poverty students lost an average of twenty-nine percent of their teachers between October 2022 and October 2023—significantly higher than the nineteen percent turnover in more affluent schools. Charter schools, particularly those in urban areas and those managed by for-profit organizations, tend to experience even higher rates. Teachers leave for many reasons, but when a school churns through staff year after year, it becomes nearly impossible to build the kind of sustained, trusting relationships that help children thrive.

Ask about the tenure of the teaching staff. How many teachers have been there more than three years? More than five? Ask about leadership stability, too. A school that has cycled through three principals in four years is a school in crisis, whatever the promotional materials say. Leadership transitions disrupt culture, interrupt initiatives, and signal to teachers that the environment is unstable—which accelerates their own departures.

Facility problems might seem superficial, but they matter. A school operating out of a cramped storefront, constantly relocating, or lacking basic amenities like a gymnasium or adequate outdoor space is often a school struggling financially or organizationally. Children need room to move, play, and learn in varied settings. A facility that feels like an afterthought probably is one.

• • •

Financial red flags deserve careful attention, even though school finances can feel opaque and intimidating. According to the 2024 analysis by the Network for Public Education, nearly half of charter school closures between 2022 and 2024 resulted from low enrollment—schools that couldn't attract or retain enough students to remain financially viable. The second most common cause, accounting for more than twenty percent of closures, was fraud or mismanagement. In states like Arizona, Florida, Michigan, and Ohio, where for-profit operators manage a significant share of charter schools, failure rates have been particularly high.

You don't need to audit the school's books, but you can ask reasonable questions. Is enrollment stable, growing, or declining? What happened to enrollment during the pandemic, and has it recovered? Does the school have a waiting list, or is it struggling to fill seats? A school that's hemorrhaging students—or that never attracted many in the first place—may be on a trajectory toward closure. That closure might come with minimal warning: the same analysis found that forty percent of charter closures gave families little or no advance notice, sometimes leaving parents to discover a shuttered building at the start of the school year.

Look for signs of financial dysfunction: frequent staff departures in administrative roles, deferred maintenance, programs that disappear mid-year without explanation, sudden fee increases, or aggressive fundraising appeals that feel desperate rather than aspirational. When the school's board includes members with obvious financial conflicts of interest—contracts with their own companies, for example—that's another warning sign. Charter schools have fewer transparency requirements than traditional public schools in many states, which means problems can fester longer before becoming visible.

• • •

School culture may be the hardest domain to evaluate from the outside, but it's where your instincts are most valuable. Discipline practices deserve particular scrutiny. Some charter schools, especially those following the "no-excuses" model that emerged in the 1990s and 2000s, have historically relied on highly prescriptive behavioral systems: silent hallways, strict uniform codes, elaborate merit and demerit systems, mandatory postures for sitting and walking. Research published by the Center for Civil Rights Remedies at UCLA has documented that some charter schools suspend students at rates higher than nearby traditional public schools, with disproportionate impact on Black students and students with disabilities.

In recent years, many prominent charter networks have reconsidered these practices. KIPP, the nation's largest charter network, retired its founding motto "Work hard. Be nice" in 2020, acknowledging that it "places value on being compliant and submissive" and "does not align with our vision of students being free to create the future they want." Other networks have followed suit, scaling back punitive discipline and investing in restorative practices. But not every school has made this shift, and some have doubled down on control-oriented approaches.

When you visit, watch how adults speak to children. Is there warmth alongside high expectations, or does the atmosphere feel more like compliance than community? A 2019 study by Harvard researchers found that students assigned to schools with high suspension rates were fifteen to twenty percent more likely to be arrested and incarcerated as adults and less likely to attend a four-year college. The effects were especially pronounced for minority boys. Discipline practices matter not just for immediate comfort but for long-term trajectories.

Pay attention to how the school handles questions. Does the principal welcome your curiosity, or does she seem defensive or dismissive? When you ask about students who struggle—academically, behaviorally, socially—what story emerges? A school that talks only about its successes, that seems unable to describe how it supports students who don't fit the mold, may be a school that quietly pushes those students out. The practice is common enough to have a name: "counseling out." It's technically illegal in most states, but it happens through a thousand subtle pressures: suggestions that another school might be "a better fit," discipline for minor infractions, recommendations to try homeschooling, repeated calls to pick up your child early.

• • •

If your child has a disability or learning difference, these concerns become more acute. Charter schools are required by federal law to serve students with disabilities and to provide the accommodations specified in Individualized Education Programs. But research has consistently found that charter schools enroll fewer students with disabilities than traditional public schools, and families frequently report being discouraged from enrolling or pressured to leave after enrollment. A December 2024 investigation in Chicago found that one charter school had failed to provide legally mandated services to more than 100 students, with some students going three years without receiving specialized instruction and others missing between 12,000 and 80,000 minutes of required services during a single school year.

Ask direct questions. What percentage of students have IEPs? Who provides special education services, and how are they staffed? What happens if a student's needs change or intensify? A school that seems uncomfortable with these questions, or that steers you toward platitudes about "meeting every child's needs," may not be equipped—or willing—to serve your child well. Trust the parents you talk to: if families of children with disabilities report feeling unwelcome or unsupported, believe them.

High student attrition is another cultural red flag, though it can be hard to see. Ask the school for data on how many students who enroll in kindergarten (or sixth grade, or ninth grade) are still there by the time they would graduate. A school that loses a third of its students each year may be producing impressive test scores partly because the students who struggle have left. The students who remain may be thriving, but the school's success is built on selection, not transformation.

• • •

So what should you actually do with all this? Start by slowing down. The school choice process often operates on tight timelines—lottery deadlines, application windows, enrollment periods—that create pressure to decide quickly. Resist that pressure as much as you can. A few extra weeks of research now could save your family years of disruption later.

Talk to parents, especially parents whose children have left the school. The families still enrolled have an incentive to believe they made the right choice; the families who left can tell you what didn't work. Ask open-ended questions: What surprised you about the school? What do you wish you'd known before enrolling? What made you decide to leave? Listen for patterns. One unhappy family is an anecdote; five unhappy families describing similar problems is a signal.

Look beyond the school's own promotional materials. Search for news coverage, regulatory filings, complaints to the state education department, and reports from the school's authorizer—the entity responsible for holding the school accountable to its charter. Many authorizers publish annual evaluations that include enrollment trends, test scores, financial audits, and compliance findings. These documents aren't light reading, but they contain information the school's marketing won't tell you.

Visit more than once, at different times of day. An afternoon tour shows you the school at its most polished; an unannounced morning drop-in shows you the school as it actually runs. Watch the hallways during transitions. Listen to the noise level at lunch. Notice whether students seem engaged or merely compliant, whether teachers seem energized or depleted, whether the building feels alive or just orderly.

Finally, trust your gut. If something feels off—if the tour guide's enthusiasm seems forced, if your questions are deflected rather than answered, if the school seems more interested in your child's test scores than in your child—pay attention. You know your family better than any admissions office does. The right school will welcome your scrutiny, because the right school has nothing to hide.

• • •

None of this means you should avoid charter schools. Many families find exactly what they're looking for: a school with a distinctive mission, a tight-knit community, educators who go above and beyond. The point isn't to discourage choice but to make it wiser. Charter schools were designed to offer alternatives, and alternatives are only valuable if families can distinguish the excellent from the troubled.

The harder truth is that school quality is never guaranteed, in any sector. Traditional public schools have problems too, sometimes severe ones. Private schools can be dysfunctional and opaque. Homeschooling works brilliantly for some families and collapses for others. Every choice involves risk, and every school—however it's funded, however it's governed—is ultimately only as good as the people running it and the conditions that allow them to succeed.

What you can do is enter the choice with open eyes. Ask the hard questions. Look for the warning signs. And if you find a school that earns your trust, one where your child feels seen and challenged and supported—hold onto it. That school exists. Your job is to find it, and to recognize it when you do.

Sources

  • Pfleger, Ryan. "Doomed to Fail: An Analysis of Charter School Closures from 1998 to 2022." National Center for Charter School Accountability and Network for Public Education, 2024.
  • Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO). "National Charter School Study." Stanford University, 2023.
  • Education Resource Strategies. "Examining School-Level Teacher Turnover Trends (2021-24)." 2024.
  • RAND Corporation. "Educator Turnover Continues Decline Toward Prepandemic Levels: Findings from the American School District Panel." 2024.
  • Losen, Daniel J., et al. "Charter Schools, Civil Rights and School Discipline: A Comprehensive Review." UCLA Civil Rights Project, 2016.
  • Bacher-Hicks, Andrew, Stephen Billings, and David Deming. "The School to Prison Pipeline: Long-Run Impacts of School Suspensions on Adult Crime." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 2019.
  • Learning Policy Institute. "Pushed Out: Trends and Disparities in Out-of-School Suspension." 2024.
  • Golann, Joanne W. "Scripting the Moves: Culture and Control in a 'No-Excuses' Charter School." Princeton University Press, 2021.
  • Bingham, A.J., and McCann, K. "'Learning Can't Occur in Chaos:' A Critical Policy Discourse Analysis of No Excuses Charter School Websites." Urban Review, 2024.
  • Philadelphia Talent Coalition. "Teacher Attrition Report." Elevate 215, 2024.
  • Illinois State Board of Education. "Investigation of Instituto Health Sciences Career Academy Special Education Violations." Chicago Public Schools, 2024.
  • New York City Independent Budget Office. "Comparing Student Attrition Rates at Charter Schools and Nearby Traditional Public Schools." 2015.
  • U.S. Department of Education. "The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: Final Report." Institute of Education Sciences, 2010.
  • Michigan Department of Education. "State Board of Education Approves Measure to Increase Charter School Transparency." 2024.
  • Cohodes, Sarah. "Charter Schools and the Achievement Gap." The Future of Children, Princeton University, 2018.